import java.util.ArrayList;import java.util.List;import org.apache.commons.lang.StringUtils;import org.junit.Test;import org.slf4j.Logger;import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;public class TestString { private final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(this.getClass()); @Test public void testPlus() { String s = ""; long ts = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { s = s + String.valueOf(i); } long te = System.currentTimeMillis(); logger.info("+ cost {} ms", te - ts); } @Test public void testConcat() { String s = ""; long ts = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { s = s.concat(String.valueOf(i)); } long te = System.currentTimeMillis(); logger.info("concat cost {} ms", te - ts); } @Test public void testJoin() { Listlist = new ArrayList (); long ts = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { list.add(String.valueOf(i)); } StringUtils.join(list, ""); long te = System.currentTimeMillis(); logger.info("StringUtils.join cost {} ms", te - ts); } @Test public void testStringBuffer() { StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(); long ts = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) { sb.append(String.valueOf(i)); } sb.toString(); long te = System.currentTimeMillis(); logger.info("StringBuffer cost {} ms", te - ts); } @Test public void testStringBuilder() { StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(); long ts = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) { sb.append(String.valueOf(i)); } sb.toString(); long te = System.currentTimeMillis(); logger.info("StringBuilder cost {} ms", te - ts); }}
运行结果如下:
11:00:22,359 INFO TestString:23 - + cost 1828 ms
11:00:22,921 INFO TestString:34 - concat cost 562 ms11:00:22,937 INFO TestString:46 - StringUtils.join cost 16 ms11:00:22,968 INFO TestString:58 - StringBuffer cost 31 ms11:00:23,031 INFO TestString:70 - StringBuilder cost 63 ms总结:
用+的方式效率最差,concat由于是内部机制实现,比+的方式好了不少。
Join 和 StringBuffer,相差不大,Join方式要快些,可见这种中快速拼接字符串的方式在中也非常适用。
StringBuilder 的速度最快,但其有线程安全的问题,而且只有JDK5支持。